30-06-2025

IRD Compliance: 5 Filing Scenarios That Trigger Reviews

Avoid IRD prosecution with our guide to 5 critical payroll filing scenarios. Learn prevention strategies, see real case examples, and protect your NZ business from compliance reviews.
S
Two construction workers talking together

The bottom line: IRD has increased audit activity by 50% in 2024, with a stronger focus on payroll compliance. Understanding these key filing scenarios helps keep your business on track.

IRD's compliance focus has intensified across 2024-25, with investigations affecting retail, hospitality, construction, and professional services businesses. While most businesses operate compliantly, staying informed about compliance requirements is more critical than ever.

Recent enforcement activity shows that IRD is taking payroll compliance seriously. Prosecutions for significant tax evasion and PAYE failures are making headlines, and the cases typically involve businesses that have systematically avoided their obligations over extended periods.

Here's the thing—most compliance issues are entirely preventable when you understand what triggers them.

divider

Quick risk check: where does your business stand?

Take a moment to consider these scenarios honestly:

Do your monthly wage costs vary by more than 30% without clear documentation? Are contractors performing similar work to your employees? Do you operate related companies where employees receive payments from different entities?

What about tax code complications—employees using STC codes without proper verification or recent redundancies processed without specialist guidance?

You're operating in IRD's target zone if these situations sound familiar. The enforcement data shows they're specifically looking for these patterns, and the consequences have never been more severe.

divider

The five scenarios that put you in IRD's crosshairs

                                                                              1. Wage fluctuations that don't add up

IRD's data analytics run constantly in the background, comparing your payroll returns against historical patterns and industry benchmarks. Monthly wage variations exceeding 30% without clear business justification create immediate red flags in their systems.

The technology is sophisticated. IRD tracks business revenue through payment service providers, comparing reported income with actual receipts. When they see employees receiving 40% pay increases without corresponding revenue growth or dramatic pay cuts followed by unexplained director payments, investigations quickly follow.

Watch out for multiple employees receiving identical "bonus" payments monthly, seasonal variations that don't align with industry norms, and pay changes that don't correlate with business performance.

Your protection strategy starts with documentation: board resolutions for salary increases, performance reviews tied to specific outcomes, and project completion bonuses with clear justification. When you file employment information showing significant variations, include explanatory notes referencing your supporting documentation.

Automated payroll systems provide real-time alerts when pay changes exceed set thresholds, eliminating the manual tracking gaps that create compliance vulnerabilities. Monthly variance reports become automatic rather than another administrative task you might skip during busy periods.

                                                                              2. The contractor classification minefield

High contractor-to-employee ratios trigger immediate IRD attention, especially when similar roles receive different classification treatment. The enforcement focus has intensified because misclassification saves businesses significant costs in ACC levies, holiday pay, and KiwiSaver contributions—creating unfair competitive advantages.

IRD conducts site visits to verify classifications, particularly in sectors with high cash transactions. They're looking for contractors working exclusively for one employer over extended periods, workers lacking genuine independence, and the telltale pattern of converting employees to contractors during financial pressure.

The classification requires genuine independence across multiple dimensions. Workers need to control how, when, and where work gets performed. The work shouldn't be integral to your core business operations. They should bear financial risk and provide their equipment. Most importantly, both parties need genuine intention for an independent contractor relationship.

Document these elements systematically for each contractor relationship. Written contracts specifying independence arrangements, evidence of workers serving multiple clients, equipment ownership records, and financial risk allocation. Review quarterly because employment characteristics can evolve gradually without triggering internal recognition.

Managed payroll services include access to employment law specialists through partnerships with legal experts—crucial guidance for borderline classification cases that could trigger Employment Relations Authority complaints and significant back payments.

                                                                              3. Multiple company payment complications

IRD's data matching systems automatically identify related entities and analyse payment patterns for potential tax avoidance arrangements. Red flags appear when directors receive salaries from multiple companies in alternating months or employees work for Company A but receive payments from Company B without a clear commercial rationale. The investigation triggers intensify when payment timing doesn't align with genuine business activities or when salary costs shift between entities following seasonal patterns that don't match actual business cycles.

Successful management requires centralised coordination. Designate one person responsible for PAYE obligations across all entities. Document the commercial rationale behind cross-entity payments through written service agreements, time allocation records, and board resolutions approving employment arrangements.

IRD requires employment information filing within two working days of payday. Late filing penalties start at $250 monthly, regardless of how many times you file late in that month.

Coordinating filing dates across entities prevents red flags from mismatched timing while ensuring compliance with these tight deadlines. Multi-entity coordination through centralised platforms eliminates timing discrepancies while maintaining proper separation for legitimate business purposes.

                                                                              4. Special tax code complications

STC certificates and secondary tax codes create complex compliance requirements that frequently trigger IRD investigations. Excessive use of Special Tax Code certificates suggests potential system manipulation, while incorrect secondary tax code applications affect total annual tax calculations across multiple income sources.

The common problems start with using STC certificates beyond their validity periods or applying special rates without proper IRD certification. Employees working multiple jobs often lack proper secondary codes, creating calculation errors that IRD's systems detect automatically.

Managing this complexity requires rigorous tracking. Monthly reviews of certificate validity dates and verification of IRD numbers against certificate details. Document the circumstances justifying special tax rates clearly because IRD reviews these applications specifically for inconsistencies.

Secondary tax code verification becomes critical for employees with multiple income sources. The process involves identifying these situations during onboarding, providing guidance on appropriate code selection, and monitoring for incorrect primary code usage.

Specialised workers need specific treatment under current IRD tax code guidance. NSW tax code for recognised seasonal workers under the RSE scheme, CAE tax code for casual agricultural workers with maximum 3-month periods, and EDW tax code for election workers during 2-week periods only.

Automated tax code validation ensures correct codes based on worker visa status and employment duration, with built-in expiry tracking and renewal reminders. By catching these issues early, you avoid the errors that trigger IRD corrections and subsequent investigations.

                                                                              5. Final payment processing pitfalls

Termination payments create multiple compliance hazards because different payment types require specific tax treatment. Redundancy payments use lump sum tax rates without ACC levies, while payment in lieu of notice applies normal PAYE rates with complete ACC levy calculations. Meanwhile, holiday pay settlements require normal rates but with precise Holidays Act 2003 calculations for accrued entitlements.

The errors that trigger investigations include incorrect redundancy payments, including ACC levies, missing holiday pay calculations in final settlements, and termination payments that are categorised incorrectly, affecting tax calculations. These mistakes directly affect employee entitlements and create compliance gaps that IRD's systems identify through cross-referencing with other employer data.

Accurate processing requires clear classification guidelines and calculation verification using IRD's PAYE calculator. Document categorisation decisions carefully because final payment disputes often escalate to IRD review of your broader payroll practices.

Timing compliance adds another layer of complexity. Employment information must be filed before the 15th and month-end PAYE payment due dates, with payments included in the correct tax year period. Reference IRD's employment information guidance for specific reporting timeframes.

Built-in termination calculators automatically apply correct tax rates and ACC rules, while integrated holiday pay calculations ensure compliant settlements and eliminate manual calculation errors.

divider

What the prosecution reality looks like

Recent enforcement cases demonstrate IRD's enhanced capability to track compliance failures across multiple business structures. Prosecutions typically involve businesses that have systematically avoided their obligations over extended periods, often across various companies.

The cases show a pattern of repeat offending, where business owners liquidate companies only to establish new entities while continuing the same violations. IRD has demonstrated its commitment to tracking these patterns and holding individuals accountable regardless of corporate restructuring.

The graduated penalty system compounds compliance costs rapidly. Late filing penalties start at $250 monthly, while late payment penalties begin at 1% and escalate to 4% within seven days, then 1% monthly.

Combined with comprehensive audit triggers, these scenarios create significant operational and financial risks that can overwhelm businesses quickly.

divider

Technology as your compliance shield

The businesses successfully avoiding IRD attention share common characteristics—they've eliminated manual processes that create compliance vulnerabilities.

Whether through DIY payroll with built-in compliance features or managed payroll services with dedicated specialists, systematic approaches prevent the human errors that trigger investigations.

Essential protection includes real-time IRD rate updates that implement changes automatically, integrated payday filing that ensures submission within the IRD's 2-day requirement, and intelligent tax code validation that prevents incorrect usage before it reaches IRD systems.

Compliance features eliminate the manual processes that create these dangerous scenarios. The contrast is stark between businesses relying on spreadsheets and manual tracking—where errors accumulate into prosecution scenarios—and those using comprehensive systems that prevent issues before they develop.

divider

Your action plan by business size

                                                                Small businesses need automated protection

Small businesses need automated payroll with built-in compliance protection. Transitioning from manual systems to integrated platforms provides immediate protection through automated validation and filing capabilities.

Growing businesses require comprehensive oversight

Growing businesses require comprehensive oversight with advanced reporting capabilities. Managed services become valuable for complex scenarios where internal expertise gaps create ongoing risk exposure.

Established businesses benefit from professional management

Established businesses benefit from professional compliance management through dedicated specialists and comprehensive audit systems. Professional oversight costs remain minimal compared to potential IRD penalties and prosecution exposure.

divider

Taking the next step

The enforcement landscape demands proactive compliance management, but the solution is straightforward.

Systematic compliance management supported by robust technology eliminates the human error factor that creates prosecutions. Prevention through proper systems and processes offers the only reliable protection against IRD's intensified scrutiny.

The businesses thriving in this environment recognise that compliance isn't a cost—it's insurance against catastrophic failure.

Want to see how straightforward compliance protection can be? Contact us to discuss your payroll compliance needs and create a roadmap to bulletproof protection without the operational stress.

The investment in proper systems pays for itself when it prevents your first IRD investigation.